Wall dampness detection with thermal imaging

If your passage floor looked like that you would be pretty upset knowing what caused it and why:

IMG_4170

 

The cause of timber floor fluting (cupping) is a water leak getting under timber, swelling it and causing it to expand but why and where?

Thermal image provided answer where to look, inside this wall:

IMG_4168

Although invisible to naked eye, thermal imaging provided leak location in seconds (dark areas on bottom of passage wall are colder than the rest of the wall because they are damp from water leak).

Before you start blundering about smashing plaster to look for leaks thermal scan could save you time and unnecessary damage.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Building Defects | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Roof leak detection with thermal imaging

Thermal imaging is a wonderful (and expensive) tool that can scan room wall and ceiling surfaces in seconds and in the hands of experienced operator can detect a wide variety of otherwise invisible defects.

Just recently I was carrying out pre purchase inspection and the invisible roof leak was detected in the garage:

IMG_2308

 

IMG_2326

If your property inspector does not have one he is not serious about giving you the best inspection

 

 

 

 

Posted in Pre-Purchase Inspections | Tagged | Leave a comment

Building Expert evidence prevails in VCAT

Just recently I was giving expert evidence in VCAT proceedings in relation to defective building works to four townhouses and the estimated cost of rectifying defects for the owners. Builder brought his own building consultant. Not surprisingly my estimates were very much higher than his. In such cases experts give evidence concurrently enabling Member to hear and decide for themselves the validity and the weight of the evidence.

As it happened my evidence prevailed on most significant and big ticket items and contributed to significantly larger award than if builder’s consultant evidence was accepted.

The decision is now published and for those interested: Guney & Ors v CFM Property Group Pty Ltd (Domestic Building) [2013] VCAT 514 (16 April 2013)

Will it make difference if you get Building Expert or building consultant?

You bet!

Posted in Building Disputes- Expert Witness | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Playing Russian roulette with building inspections? Will the gun go off?

People often overlook independent building stage inspections either through ignorance or because they are making choice to save money.

However this is not a simple commercial decision and the risks are far greater than you can imagine. If something does go wrong it will cost you thousands if not tens or hundreds of thousands and or you will have to accept and live with sub standard quality.

I have seen countless homes and investments ruined or at the very least aesthetically devalued. It does not matter if you are a first home buyer or if your home is over a million dollars.

Some people have dumb luck, no inspections and the home is OK but with others the gun goes off. Consider a recently completed home at pre final stage inspection, it already has structural failure:

This is a new home, not yet handed over!

DSC_9149 DSC_9156

 

How do I help the owner?, I have no photographic record during construction and even though I suspect poorly drained site ( the builder has poor drainage on his other sites) it may be difficult to get the evidence.

This kind of problem could have been prevented for if I have been called to do stage inspections: slab, frame and pre plaster I could have drawn attention to drainage matters.

Just remember that if you are playing Russian roulette with your investment, the gun might just go off!

 

Posted in Building Defects, New Home Inspections, pre final inspection, Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Building a new home? What’s cooking?

You would not think that building a new home has anything to do with cooking. It does not but cooking is great analogy to building a home. There is recipe, a dish and the cook.

Builder is the cook, your house plans, specifications and the contract are a recipe and your house is the dish.

On my stage inspections I regularly find owners who don’t have plans, have incomplete plans (often they don’t have engineering plans) and sometimes do not even have a contract. How will you know that the cook is following the recipe if you don’t even have the recipe? How will your dish turn out?

You can take risks with your investments by skipping on professional building stage inspections, but you will be playing a “Russian roulette” but not even knowing what the recipe is, is an act of stupidity.

So when your dish is not what you expected and leaves you with a sour taste it could be too late and could make your wallet very sick.

http://www.buildingexpert.net.au/new-home-stage.htm

 

 

Posted in New Home Inspections | Leave a comment

Guide to standards and tolerances, what is wrong with it?

The first thing wrong with Guide to Standards and Tolerances is its title, it should be ” Standards and Tolerances for Dummies“. If it were so it would be a perfect document and a full credit to the Building Commission. As a reference it would take homeowner with no knowledge of building to come into the ball park of the required knowledge and give reasonable understanding of the common issues.

However the guide and its application is misrepresented by BC and has enabled builders to hijack it and make it their God sent Bible “the book of excuses for poor workmanship”

So how can the application of the guide be misrepresented? Simple, consider what BC says:

The Guide to Standards and Tolerances is only a guide and an advisory document. It is not a regulated standard and is not part of this hierarchy.

and

Where there is any contradiction or difference between the Guide and an Act, a regulation, the Building Code of Australia or a building contract, all of these take precedence over the Guide. The Guide does not replace the requirements of these other documents.

however then it says inexplicably:

This document may be used as a guide to determine whether or not an item is defective.

 

So what’s wrong with that? Plenty! The fact is that the implied warranties of Domestic Building Contract Act 1995 section 8 state :

(a) (1) The builder warrants that the work will be carried out in a proper and workmanlike manner.

and

(d) (1)The builder warrants that the work will be carried out with reasonable care and skill

means that the warranty blanket overrides all of builders work and Guide to Standards and tolerances has no function to play in determination of building defects. It’s only good enough to be guide for dummies.

The warranty test is the only legal and proper test as to whether builder’s work is defective, forget about the guide.

When you see builder reaching for the guide he is only reaching for excuses, don’t believe it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Guide to Standards and Tolerances, it’s just “Tolerances For Dummies”

This is a copy of my post on Homeone forum:

Ownit: what can anyone tell me about the responsibility of the builder when there are visible ceiling and wall joins? they claim it’s within “tolerance” but in my opinion it’s visible to the naked eye under normal lighting and with daylight shining through the windows.

if that is within australian standard, australian standard is quite poor..

This is where I disagree with others in the industry and in particularly with BC that produced The Guide to Standards and Tolerances.

Many people mistakenly think that the guide is the standard,the law it’s not. All it is is “Tolerances For Dummies”.
The problem with the guide is that it attempts to “formalise” defects. Something looks like s**t but it’s OK because it is within tolerances. I have seen many items of work that were defective yet there was builder’s attempt to avoid rectification because it was “within tolerances”

I am a builder and yes I believe that every builder is entitled to tolerance but what is reasonable is always a question of fact and not what is written by BC. So how do we do it? Here we are guided by law in Victoria and in particular Domestic Building Contract Act 1995 S8
Implied warranties : (d)(1)The builder warrants that the work will be carried out with reasonable care and skill.

Builders are educated and trained for the precise reason so that they can produce building work that is not only functional but also pleasing to the eye. Pleasing to the eye means free from obvious defects. Free from evidence of lack of care and skill.

In my view a proper assessment of defect is to look at the workmanship in question and ask: Would a reasonable person expect better standard from a tradesperson ordinarily skilled in their art? If the answer is yes, then yes a defect is confirmed. That is the law, forget about the guide. My derivative on that is Mladichek Law No2 “If it looks wrong it is”

Ask yourself a question. Would managing directors of building company have the same display of workmanship in their house? There is your answer.

To answer Ownit problem: If you can see joints in normal daylight viewing conditions it’s a defect. Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.

 

Posted in frame inspection, New Home Inspections, pre final inspection, pre plaster inspection | 2 Comments

Pre final inspection, settle without one could give you a headache!

I have just inspected a unit settled without pre final inspection that among many other things suffers from serious garage flooding. It’s not surprising because there is failure to design and construct proper retaining wall and the competent drainage and waterproofing

Unknown-2IMG_6586IMG_6600IMG_6589IMG_6632Had I been engaged to carry out stage inspection this would have been picked up early on and rectified before handover.

Now the cost of getting it fixed will greatly exceed the cost of stage inspection as a form of prevention. Also add the inconvenience to the owner.

Posted in New Home Inspections, pre final inspection, Uncategorized | Tagged | 1 Comment

Building pre final inspections, talk is cheap I deliver!

There are many pretenders out there who would like to do what I do but just can’t cut it. Would they have the balls to say this in their report?

Expert Opinion:

The builder is not co-operating regarding fixing of framing defects.

The frame is poorly set out and poorly constructed and requires substantial rectification prior to stage completion.

Recommendations:

 The builder is required to rectify all framing defects and obtain approval before making progress claims and proceeding with the next stage.

This builder has previously appeared at inquiry into conduct at BPB for professional misconduct and has been fined for multiple breaches but it seems has learned nothing. Official complaint to BPB under section 178(d) of the Building Act 1993 with a request for inquiry into builders conduct is highly recommended.

Yes I did get the letter from the builder’s general manager complaining with some bull****

Dear Mr Branko Mladichek

 I have received a copy of a report that you complied as a result of providing services to one of our clients as per the attached.

******* Homes, as you would be aware are a large volume home builder with many homes under construct at any one time.

I am not blind to that fact that we do have items on some homes. We are currently undertaking our own Quality audits on our homes across Victoria to gauge the level of product we are providing and more importantly address areas we need to improve on.

In saying this I am concerned that you have made comment referring to the below as written by you the author of this report on this particular home noted as your recommendations.

 Quote

Recommendations:

The builder is required to rectify all framing defects and obtain approval before making progress claims and

proceeding with the next stage.

This builder has previously appeared at inquiry into conduct at BPB for professional misconduct and has been

fined for multiple breaches but it seems has learned nothing. Official complaint to BPB under section 178(d) of

the Building Act 1993 with a request for inquiry into builders conduct is highly recommended.-Un quote

 Firstly I am disappointed that the items were not addressed by means of repair or justification upon receipt of your Frame report however I do have a concern with your high recommendation and your misrepresentation of this enquiry not disclosing the entire findings, especially when you include the below in the same very report.

 Limitations and Report Disclaimer

Why is this Building Expert Report not an Expert Witness VCAT Report?

Building Expert Report provides Expert Opinion without proof, offered in good faith and is designed for information or

voluntary dispute resolution. Should a dispute arise in relation to alleged defect then expert opinion needs to be

supported by appropriate references to legislation and standards to prove how and why defect exists. The provision of

proof with all the additional details, references and declarations that are required from Expert Witness VCAT report is costly and will incur additional fees.

I am not discouraging any private building Inspector from our sites, quite the opposite however, If you have your clients best interest in mind, should you have any issues that you feel we as the builder have not addressed I suggest you direct any of our clients to speak with our office alerting others of the situation, not as you highly recommend as per the above. We do want to provide a Quality Home for every client .

However, I did get builder’s attention and he pulled up his socks. This is what I said in my pre final inspection report:

Expert Opinion:

It was a pleasure to inspect a nicely finished home and the best finished home by this builder I have seen for about two years. It is regrettable that severe criticism of the builder’s performance was required at pre plaster stage just to get the builder’s attention and a lift in performance and a display of quality of which he is clearly capable but which too often is not delivered.

Recommendations:

1. Reduce surface levels around the dwelling to comply with Building Code of Australia requirements. 2. Complete bathroom tiling.
3. Complete minor defects.

There you have it, after the inspection: my client, builder’s supervisor and I were shaking hands and all smiles. That ‘s the way it should have been without the dramas.

Is there anyone else that will do this for you?

Posted in New Home Inspections, pre final inspection, pre plaster inspection, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Pre purchase inspection, dampness could cost you a sale!

Recently I inspected a million dollar home and it looked it but there were problems which ultimately resulted in my client walking away from the purchase. So what was it?

The home was owner built (read trouble) and was cut into the hill at a lower level where the height site cut was the height of the room. This would normally require meticulous waterproofing and drainage to prevent dampness coming through. The problem is that owner builders don’t understand the systems of waterproofing , they rely on the contractors “doing the right thing” and the water is intolerant and unforgiving of lapses in workmanship.

So it was in this case, we had bedrooms, where you sleep one third of your life breathing in mould spores in the air caused by dampness coming through stone walls. It is not healthy of course and may cause allergies or respiratory problems.

DSC_5374 DSC_5409

Further complicating the issue is the fact that there was no quick and convenient fix. It would require excavation down the side of the dwelling and re doing drainage and waterproofing. If you had more than a million to spend on the house would you bother?

So it was, my client walked and a week later found and purchased another home.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment